Tuesday, June 10, 2003
By Imad Khadduri
Former Iraqi nuclear scientist
YellowTimes.org Guest Columnist (
-- As the swelter of anger bubbles from the machination of misinformation that
led to the faltering WMD casus belli
for invading Iraq, the retreat and half-baked excuses of Bush, Blair, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Powell further expose the sharp edge of their
deceit. Whether it was "intelligence" failure or "flailing"
the intelligence, time will soon tell. In the meantime, the fig leaves keep
Late Edition with Colin Powell, reported by the Toronto Star on June 9, 2003,
Powell claimed that "the two alleged mobile biological weapons labs, which
are being studied by allied inspectors now in Iraq, are the same ones he
described to the world last Feb. 5 at a U.N. presentation which was the result
of four days and four nights of meetings with the CIA." "I stand
behind that presentation," he said.
He further asserted, "I'll give you the killer argument why these vans were exactly what I said they were. I can assure you that if those biological vans were not ... what I said they were on the 5th of February, on the 6th of February Iraq would have hauled those vans out, put them in front of a press conference, given them to U.N. inspectors to try to drive a stake through the heart of my presentation."
Only if the
Iraqis knew which vans he was talking about.
In an article
published on the same day as Powell's interview, Peter Beaumont and Antony Barnett reported in the Observer that there is
mounting indications that these vans were for "balloons, not germs."
According to the
article, "Senior Iraqi officials of the al-Kindi
Research, Testing, Development, and Engineering facility in
who have examined the evidence agree and have cast doubt over the Bush
administration's assertions. They argue that the lack of any trace of pathogens
found in the fermentation tanks, the use of canvas sides on vehicles where
technicians would be working with dangerous germ cultures, and the lack of an
autoclave for steam sterilization all provide credence to the Iraqi argument
that the labs were merely used for artillery balloons.
In fact, the
American experts themselves concede that the van could, at best, serve only one
stage of the process for biological weapons production. There would need to be
three or four other stages in the process, or other complementary vans, to be
able to produce Powell's less than heuristic claim.
Powell is not
new to this misinformation game.
In my earlier
article, "The demise of the nuclear bomb hoax," published on February
16, 2003, I referred to Geoff Simons' The Scourging of Iraq in which "
references an article by Maggie O'Kane, published in
the Guardian on 16 December 1995, which revealed that the enterprising
journalist was Jean Heller of the St. Petersburg Times in
So, was Powell
really worried that the Iraqis might "try to drive a stake through the
heart of [his] presentation"?
Well, it's never
has a MSc in Physics from the
The URL for this article was:
YellowTimes.org has shut down due to funding issues. While this may be temporary, it also may be permanent. We appreciate your past support.